Comments for Random Thoughts on Software http://javidjamae.com Javid Jamae's thoughts on Java, software, and other random things Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:00:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2 Comment on Timing in Java by javid http://javidjamae.com/2004/02/20/timing-in-java/#comment-299 javid Thu, 25 Dec 2008 14:54:03 +0000 http://javidjamae.com/2004/02/20/timing-in-java/#comment-299 I probably had a good reason for the System.gc() 4 years ago when I posted this, but I can't think of the reason off the top of my head now. I probably had a good reason for the System.gc() 4 years ago when I posted this, but I can’t think of the reason off the top of my head now.

]]> Comment on Timing in Java by Timothy Boulan http://javidjamae.com/2004/02/20/timing-in-java/#comment-298 Timothy Boulan Thu, 25 Dec 2008 00:19:46 +0000 http://javidjamae.com/2004/02/20/timing-in-java/#comment-298 This worked for me, thanks! Why do you have System.gc() in the end() method? I didn't see the point of that one. This worked for me, thanks!
Why do you have System.gc() in the end() method? I didn’t see the point of that one.

]]> Comment on Most common Persian words by Shahram http://javidjamae.com/2007/11/10/most-common-persian-words/#comment-297 Shahram Fri, 05 Dec 2008 16:13:00 +0000 http://javidjamae.com/2007/11/10/most-common-persian-words/#comment-297 I came across your blog from on of your article in DevX.com. I work as Java/J2EE developer in Canada. It was exciting to find an Iranian with java expertise and many articles and book. I just want to say hello wish you best of luck. I came across your blog from on of your article in DevX.com.
I work as Java/J2EE developer in Canada.
It was exciting to find an Iranian with java expertise and many articles and book.
I just want to say hello wish you best of luck.

]]> Comment on Response Time vs. Latency by Okoduwa James http://javidjamae.com/2005/04/07/response-time-vs-latency/#comment-296 Okoduwa James Tue, 02 Dec 2008 11:28:51 +0000 http://javidjamae.com/2005/04/07/response-time-vs-latency/#comment-296 It was an experience for me to be able to know the little difference between both words.hoping to see more details on the topic. My regards to u all................................... It was an experience for me to be able to know the little difference between both words.hoping to see more details on the topic.
My regards to u all……………………………..

]]> Comment on A Wiki is no place for a conversation by Recent Links Tagged With "wiki" - JabberTags http://javidjamae.com/2008/08/27/a-wiki-is-no-place-for-a-conversation/#comment-295 Recent Links Tagged With "wiki" - JabberTags Sat, 18 Oct 2008 23:49:36 +0000 http://javidjamae.com/2008/08/27/a-wiki-is-no-place-for-a-conversation/#comment-295 [...] public links >> wiki A Wiki is no place for a conversation Saved by drewbernard on Fri 17-10-2008 dskmag Saved by JamaicanQueen92 on Sat 04-10-2008 The [...] […] public links >> wiki A Wiki is no place for a conversation Saved by drewbernard on Fri 17-10-2008 dskmag Saved by JamaicanQueen92 on Sat 04-10-2008 The […]

]]> Comment on Dallas/Fort Worth JBoss Users Group by javid http://javidjamae.com/2006/03/14/dallasfort-worth-jboss-users-group/#comment-294 javid Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:58:41 +0000 http://javidjamae.com/2006/03/14/dallasfort-worth-jboss-users-group/#comment-294 Yes, but I don't run the group any more. You can go to the Goolge Groups forums to get more details. http://groups.google.com/group/DFW-JBUG---Announce http://groups.google.com/group/DFW-JBUG Valtech (whom I no longer work for) owns the domain, and I guess they decided to take down the site. I hope that the new group owners can acquire the domain from them. Yes, but I don’t run the group any more. You can go to the Goolge Groups forums to get more details.

http://groups.google.com/group/DFW-JBUG—Announce
http://groups.google.com/group/DFW-JBUG

Valtech (whom I no longer work for) owns the domain, and I guess they decided to take down the site. I hope that the new group owners can acquire the domain from them.

]]> Comment on Dallas/Fort Worth JBoss Users Group by Simon http://javidjamae.com/2006/03/14/dallasfort-worth-jboss-users-group/#comment-293 Simon Tue, 05 Aug 2008 14:42:17 +0000 http://javidjamae.com/2006/03/14/dallasfort-worth-jboss-users-group/#comment-293 Does this group still exist, the site is down? Does this group still exist, the site is down?

]]> Comment on Annotations vs. XML by Mariusz http://javidjamae.com/2006/11/19/annotations-vs-xml/#comment-151 Mariusz Fri, 14 Mar 2008 13:31:31 +0000 http://javidjamae.com/2006/11/19/annotations-vs-xml/#comment-151 John, consider another thing, those are not POJO's in it's strict sense, those are Entities! John,

consider another thing, those are not POJO’s in it’s strict sense, those are Entities!

]]> Comment on Response Time vs. Latency by Maddy http://javidjamae.com/2005/04/07/response-time-vs-latency/#comment-9 Maddy Tue, 05 Feb 2008 09:22:00 +0000 http://javidjamae.com/2005/04/07/response-time-vs-latency/#comment-9 I have another example for this Latency and Processing Time.<br/><br/>10 People given a print of a single sheet to a printer, and am the last guy to give the print.<br/>The Printer will take 10 seconds to print the sheet. <br/><br/>So for me.<br/><br/>Latency = 90 Seconds<br/>Processing Time = 10 Seconds<br/>Response Time = 90 + 10 = 100 Seconds.<br/><br/>But for the first guy in the queue,<br/><br/>Latency = 0 Sec(as he is the first guy)<br/>Processing Time = 10 Sec<br/>Response Time = 0+ 10 = 10 Seconds I have another example for this Latency and Processing Time.

10 People given a print of a single sheet to a printer, and am the last guy to give the print.
The Printer will take 10 seconds to print the sheet.

So for me.

Latency = 90 Seconds
Processing Time = 10 Seconds
Response Time = 90 + 10 = 100 Seconds.

But for the first guy in the queue,

Latency = 0 Sec(as he is the first guy)
Processing Time = 10 Sec
Response Time = 0+ 10 = 10 Seconds

]]> Comment on Annotations vs. XML by John http://javidjamae.com/2006/11/19/annotations-vs-xml/#comment-27 John Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:56:00 +0000 http://javidjamae.com/2006/11/19/annotations-vs-xml/#comment-27 Working on a Hibernate/Spring project right now. Got spring cfg in XML and Hib in Annotations.<br/>Recently started becoming concerned with the fact that my Pojo's now know something about their persist store (tables/cols etc) and the imports now directly reference hibernate classes for the annotations - which is kinda ugly when in some environments I'm using them as pojo's and in our unit test env where we mock there is no Hibernate.<br/><br/><br/>This leads me towards an all XML approach but I don't find the proliferation of non-java artefacts very appealing either. Working on a Hibernate/Spring project right now. Got spring cfg in XML and Hib in Annotations.
Recently started becoming concerned with the fact that my Pojo’s now know something about their persist store (tables/cols etc) and the imports now directly reference hibernate classes for the annotations - which is kinda ugly when in some environments I’m using them as pojo’s and in our unit test env where we mock there is no Hibernate.

This leads me towards an all XML approach but I don’t find the proliferation of non-java artefacts very appealing either.

]]>